4 ms·
> Every magazine I checked out was MOSTLY ads I think you might be looking at this situation through rose-colored glasses. When I was a kid in the 2000s, I lov
by ryukoposting 2y ago
> Every magazine I checked out was MOSTLY ads
I think you might be looking at this situation through rose-colored glasses. When I was a kid in the 2000s, I loved reading PopSci and I distinctly remember at least 30-40% of it being ads throughout most of the magazine. And then, the last 20+ pages were all ads.
Looking even further back, I've had to do some research on 90s vintage computers lately, and every edition of PCMag I've dug through has been laden with ads. It's even more packed with ads than I remember PopSci being 10-15 years later.
Maybe it wasn't mostly ads, but it wasn't far off.
What has changed is the annoyances ads cause. Online ads load slowly, screw with the layout while you're reading, and are overall much more disruptive to the reading experience than a print ad could ever be.
- Kye 2y agoYep. And the ads were often good. I read Popular Science and Popular Mechanics growing up. The ads weren't just some bland spec sheet, they went into the technology or engineering behind whatever it was advertising. The ads could be as good as the articles. Simpler ads would at least try to be clever.
- ryukoposting 2y agoI do recall a handful of the full-page PopSci "back of the mag" ads being articles in their own right, and sometimes they were as well-written as the actual articles written by PopSci. Although those were always the exception, rather than the norm, I feel like that kind of thing is just gone. That said, I wonder if it's caused by limits in the ad delivery methods we use today, rather than some industry wide lack of interest in making quality ads. I can't conceive of how such an ad would be delivered through Google, for example. Meta? Maybe.
- ghaff 2y agoThere are a lot of people here who react viscerally to any advertising in any form. I'd point that Computer Shopper was a huge magazine with some pro-forma often low-rent writing that existed as basically a vehicle to deliver ads to people who couldn't really get that information any other way. PC Mag/Byte/etc. was higher quality editorial but still had a lot of advertising.
- jhbadger 2y agoIndeed. As I recall Computer Shopper's articles were the legally minimum percentage of the magazine to make it qualify as a periodical rather than a catalog (US postage rates between the two differed, with periodicals being cheaper). We subscribed for the ads, but some of the articles (like Don Lancaster teaching writing Postscript manually to create figures) were interesting.
- ghaff 2y agoYou take what you can as a freelancer and I'm sure I know a number of folks who wrote for a the magazine at some point or other and did a fine job. But you certainly didn't subscribe or buy issues for the articles.
- musicale 2y agoMagazine ads don't bother me, especially if they're on-topic (e.g. PC ads in a PC magazine.) I find ads in vintage PC magazines to be particularly interesting and fun. But web ads are typically obnoxious, intrusive, and off-topic. Delivery formats such as pop-up windows and auto-playing video are so disruptive that there are browser settings to block them – settings which web advertisers work tirelessly to subvert. The commercial web has become unusable without ad blockers.
- andyjohnson0 2y ago> I think you might be looking at this situation through rose-colored glasses. When I was a kid in the 2000s, I loved reading PopSci and I distinctly remember at least 30-40% of it being ads throughout most of the magazine. And then, the last 20+ pages were all ads. I was a nerdy kid in the early 80s, and when I wasn't hanging out in computer shops and electronics junk shops, I was often in WH Smith [1] browsing the sci/tech magazines. My recollection is that they were pretty good in terms of articles, and even many of the adverts were interesting. I suspect this was because (before the net) it was hard to find out about stuff that wasn't mainstream: so ads for telescopes or chem kits or single-board computers seemed kind of exotic. Electronics mags with pages of ads listing components were information. And you could actually buy the RS Catalogue there - which, while not a magazine, had so much interesting stuff in it. And a bit later, Computer Shopper with endless pages of densely-packed ads listing ram chips and cpus and cmos logic chips, and the ink that came off on your fingers... So the ads were often an important learning resource back then. At least for kids with limited resources like I was. [1] National chain of newsagents here in the UK.
- buggeryorkshire 2y agoHa, I used to work at WH Smith HQ in Swindon. The warehouse people used to nick the cover disks from the magazines and sell them. And each loo on each floor had a fresh new porn mag in the cistern! Don't even get me on Tales of Farthing Wood which caused a national shitstorm...
- jll29 2y agoYes, paper catalogs had high information and education content e.g. the Whole Earth Catalog in the US or the IKEA catalog in Europe are cult items. There are also different national prior probabilities for reading magazines as a habit in different cultures: for example, both the UK and Germany had a strong computer magazine culture, whereas in the US there was less of it (Byte and Dr Dobb's Journal being notable exceptions). The German "c't - magazin für computer technik" is still Europe's largest computer magazine (https://www.heise.de/ct https://www.heise.de/ct). Europe also has comic magazines by Disney (featuring Donald Duck, Mickey Mouse. & co.), which never existed in the US, unlike the animation films.