> There's nothing I've not managed to make with openscad yet, though the things I have made are embarrassingly simple (yet highly functional). It is workable i

> There's nothing I've not managed to make with openscad yet, though the things I have made are embarrassingly simple (yet highly functional). It is workable if you have an extremely solid grasp of mathematics, and you don't mind objects that ultimately retain the feel of the combination of a few CSG primitives. But I make 3D-printed things that for a variety of reasons are little more than rings, plates, discs, and helixes, and I've already very clearly run into situations where the face/vertex/wire model of a proper CAD package is more or less the only way to keep control over a design.