2 ms·
And for round two went with a lesswrong sequences.. Here's the source https://www.lesswrong.com/s/gFvira6tHpLXnqCLH/p/TGux5Fhcd7GmTfNGC https://www.lesswrong.c
by nandhinianand 2y ago
And for round two went with a lesswrong sequences..
Here's the source
https://www.lesswrong.com/s/gFvira6tHpLXnqCLH/p/TGux5Fhcd7GmTfNGC https://www.lesswrong.com/s/gFvira6tHpLXnqCLH/p/TGux5Fhcd7Gm...
and here's the output
>output
TL;DR: People reject new ideas for irrational reasons, not just lack of credentials. Asking "Is that your true rejection?" can help, but be careful not to psychoanalyze.
- nandhinianand 2y agoRound 3:(and last round) This time picked up one of PG's essays.... this one .. https://paulgraham.com/disagree.html https://paulgraham.com/disagree.html >output TL;DR: 1. Name-calling is weak. 2. Ad hominem attacks are weak. 3. Criticizing tone is weak. 4. Contradiction needs evidence. 5. Counterargument can be convincing. 6. Refutation is strongest, refute the central point. 7. Classifying disagreement helps identify dishonest arguments. 8. Being less mean makes people happier.