> It is still possible for what Nelson refers to as "transcopyright" issues to occur on same origin transclusions, when multiple authors reuse the same origin f

> It is still possible for what Nelson refers to as "transcopyright" issues to occur on same origin transclusions, when multiple authors reuse the same origin for hosting copyrighted content, but this is not the common case, at least in the case of the WWW. I would argue that this overwhelmingly is the common case—viz: - twitter.com - youtube.com - facebook.com - reddit.com ... etc. It is only through artificially restricting your focus outside the way that the Web is used in practice—and optionally also being so blinded by one's milieu (that of professional programmers who unlike the average person might spend between, say, 25–50% of their waking hours on a typical day at least partially focused on publishing to the origin associated with whatever they're getting paid for at the moment, but nonetheless live the rest of their lives like everyone else publishing to and consuming from the major platforms)—that you can claim something like the above.