4 ms·
It doesn't look like a seized domain/website, then his own personal "logo" wouldn't be there, and it would be clear some agency was behind it, but seems that ha
by diggan 2y ago
It doesn't look like a seized domain/website, then his own personal "logo" wouldn't be there, and it would be clear some agency was behind it, but seems that has been published by himself.
Skimmed through the linked court docs but didn't find anything about him being forced to publish something like this, although that would make sense if he was.
Seems weird to write in 3rd person though, but wouldn't be the weirdest thing that guy engaged in so who knows, diggan certainly doesn't.
- greyface- 2y agoHere's one relevant court judgment: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40981612 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40981612 I haven't read other case documents, so it may not be the final word on the matter. In particular, it doesn't contain the actual notice text.