4 ms·
Would be trivial to prove but he can't. Like saying you own a particular house but you don't have the key to the front door.
by ydnaclementine 2y ago
Would be trivial to prove but he can't. Like saying you own a particular house but you don't have the key to the front door.
- fecal_henge 2y agoWhat if you lost the key?
- nullc 2y agoWhat if you insisted you had the key and would prove that you were possibly the owner that way, but when the time came you setup a cardboard door in front of the real one and opened it using a bump key? That's essentially what has happened with Wright. There are various pieces of evidence that, while not definitive in isolation would be persuasive, which he has insisted he could use to prove himself-- but when the time came he has just been caught faking it over and over again. It's remarkable that he's been able to continue so long.
- fecal_henge 2y agoI agree he was faking it. Seems like he was an inadequate con man. He must have gotten some investment on a very high risk high reward basis I assume. But speaking of inadequate adults, sometimes I lose my key.