3 ms·
I think maybe we're just disagreeing on a legal interpretation vs a more literal interpretation of a term that is thrown around somewhat loosely. fwiw I agree
by n42 2y ago
I think maybe we're just disagreeing on a legal interpretation vs a more literal interpretation of a term that is thrown around somewhat loosely.
fwiw I agree with what you're getting at with your original response. maybe I'm arguing semantics.
the more I think about your point that this is just competitive behavior the more I question what the term anti-competive even means
- pixelbro 2y agoCompetition is important for maintaining a healthy marketplace. Any behavior that makes it harder for others to compete, reducing the amount of competition, is therefore bad. That's what anticompetitive means. I don't think protecting trade secrets is sabotaging the competition though.
- n42 2y agoI think sabotage is the word I was looking for!