this is very shallow and starts with the premise that people are stupid, or that objective truth comes from the sky. It doesn't, it used to be (free) speech bef

this is very shallow and starts with the premise that people are stupid, or that objective truth comes from the sky. It doesn't, it used to be (free) speech before it became consensus. The question of whether consensus should be challenged is a can of worms where societies differentiate themselves. Some are keen to protect the consensus above all, some others prefer having a system that is robust to consensus being challenged (america). The internet has changed these old questions very little . It's just a new medium with same old social problems