3 ms·
That bias is immutable and exists in the universe is not a compelling argument that a highly biased source is anything but. I dont reject the topic, it's intere
by josefritzishere 2y ago
That bias is immutable and exists in the universe is not a compelling argument that a highly biased source is anything but. I dont reject the topic, it's interesting, but I'd like to see more information from a less dubious source.
It's a just a fact that we have to consider the source when vetting any topic these days.
- hagbard_c 2y agoCan you describe what you mean by 'reputable' in a way which works equally well for those who are ideologically aligned with whatever source the term is applied to as to those who are ideologically opposed to it? The Blaze is comparable to The Daily Beast in style and content, the difference between the two is their ideological alignment. Where 'mediabiasfactcheck' marks The Blaze as 'questionable' (with no such marking for the Daily Beast) it is not marked as such elsewhere, e.g. on the Interactive Media Bias Chart [1]which shows these sources are more or less mirror images of each other around the centre axis. [1] https://adfontesmedia.com/interactive-media-bias-chart/ https://adfontesmedia.com/interactive-media-bias-chart/