3 ms·
The allegation is the prosecutor got a cushy gig at the law firm, not that they subsequently worked on the case after switching sides.
by triceratops 2y ago
The allegation is the prosecutor got a cushy gig at the law firm, not that they subsequently worked on the case after switching sides.
- evilos 2y agoAh so the implication is not that the prosecutor gave them inside info on the government's case's weaknesses but the prosecutor intentionally played the case suboptimally in hopes of being paid after the fact? If this was done with prior assurance that sounds already illegal no? If it was done simply on the hopes of securing "payment" afterwards with no prior deal then that seems like a large risk for the prosecutor to take.