3 ms·
The science doesn't seem to suggest that there is any "more" we can emit, hence we have to not only eliminate emissions but reduce them. Radically. We all know
by agentultra 2y ago
The science doesn't seem to suggest that there is any "more" we can emit, hence we have to not only eliminate emissions but reduce them. Radically.
We all know what the solution to that has to be. What does a world without fossil fuel use look like? How do we maintain healthy economic indicators in the current modern understanding without them?
The amount of economic advantage fossil-fuel consumption gives people over people who don't seems quite large.
I'm not certain degrowth is the answer but I don't think it's complete non-sense either. We're not dealing with a zero-sum game here but it doesn't seem likely that our current course will achieve our goals.