3 ms·
> To believe that the Original data are fake and the Posted data are real, you’d have to believe that the sensible data are fake and the backwards data are real
by andrelaszlo 2y ago
> To believe that the Original data are fake and the Posted data are real, you’d have to believe that the sensible data are fake and the backwards data are real. That is a difficult thing to believe.
> We were right about how the data were altered, Gino’s prevailing explanation for the alterations does not make sense, and yet we are the defendants in this case.
What's the academic term for "mic drop"?
https://datacolada.org/118 https://datacolada.org/118
- andrelaszlo 2y agoThis analysis is simple but brilliant. Some rows appeared out of order. They changed them back to what they should be according to their position, then checked the effects on the distributions: https://datacolada.org/111 https://datacolada.org/111
- polartx 2y agoIf she was falsifying data, I must assume it was to support a biased hypothesis she held however the article doesn’t elaborate on what conclusion her fraudulent data supported beyond this being a “behavioral science” study. Can anyone fill in the gaps to those conspicuously missing details?
- kayge 2y ago> What's the academic term for "mic drop"? I've always gone for "QED" but I'm sure there are better options out there :)