4 ms·
Is there any independent confirmation of these numbers? Seem too extraordinary to be believed without extraordinary evidence.
by abdullahkhalids 2y ago
Is there any independent confirmation of these numbers? Seem too extraordinary to be believed without extraordinary evidence.
- yen223 2y agoThe tweet uses "number of companies founded" as a metric, which to me isn't as illustrative as something like revenue/company or similar.
- signatoremo 2y agoThis is about startups, which by definition means companies founded in the previous few years, with very little revenue. His metrics make perfect sense. I must say this is a real surprise. Needs to be corroborated by another source.
- mike_hearn 2y agoThe original source is the FT citing a company that tracks startups.
- Prbeek 2y agoThe owner of that company wrote that FT cited the wrong data