4 ms·
2/3 of its revenues were from the U.S. That's... sad.
by throw7 2y ago
2/3 of its revenues were from the U.S. That's... sad.
- xyst 2y agoI wonder how much of that is from a group of lonely whales.
- dragonwriter 2y ago> 2/3 of its revenues were from the U.S. That's... sad. Probably common for a lot of luxury products; US is like 1/4 of world GDP, and a lot higher than that in personal income beyond basic needs.
- jimmygrapes 2y agoBut still around 4 to 5% of the global population. Every stat in the global context of usage/consumerism gets weird when you consider this, and even weirder when you account for debt-to-income ratio.
- dragonwriter 2y ago> But still around 4 to 5% of the global population. Yeah, but so? "Subsisitence farmers in sub-Saharan Africa spend substantially less per capita on online adult entertainment than Americans" is...not a surprising bit of information. > Every stat in the global context of usage/consumerism gets weird when you consider this Seems to me that the weird thing is the implicit premise that consumer and especially luxury spending should be expected to track population and not wealth. > and even weirder when you account for debt-to-income ratio. Are you assuming that the ability to borrow should be negatively correlated with luxury spending?
- 1oooqooq 2y agoTiktok ban mentions of WeChat just like they been saying onlyfans.
- yen223 2y agoThis just means a) the US is a huge market, and b) they haven't cracked the China market yet