2 ms·
The bulk of the risk wouldn't really scale with number of warheads though would it? I was thinking it is more of a binary. There is some number of warheads that
by roenxi 2y ago
The bulk of the risk wouldn't really scale with number of warheads though would it? I was thinking it is more of a binary. There is some number of warheads that is enough.
The experience in the Cuban Missile crisis suggests that the number deployed on submarines is probably more of a concern when it comes to miscalculation than the total. And for deliberate attacks the militaries have probably calculated that the number currently deployed is reasonable to wipe out a major power.
- stickfigure 2y agoThe risk of an accident or otherwise unintentional initiation goes up with the number of warheads deployed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_submarine_B-59#Nuclear_close_call https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_submarine_B-59#Nuclear_... (or of course Dr Strangelove)