2 ms·

> Cargo is widely recognized as low quality. Can you point me to both of: * why it's considered low quality * evidence of this "wide regard" Other than rand

> Cargo is widely recognized as low quality. Can you point me to both of: * why it's considered low quality * evidence of this "wide regard" Other than random weirdos who think allowing dependencies is a bad practice because you could hurt yourself, while extolling the virtues of undefined behavior - I've never heard much serious criticism of it.

anonfordays 2y ago
[flagged]
akira2501 2y ago
> why it's considered low quality Other software providing the same features produce better results for those users. It's dependency management is fundamentally broken and causes builds to be much slower than they could otherwise be. Lack of namespaces which is a lesson well learned before the first line of Cargo was ever written. I could go on. > evidence of this "wide regard" We are on the internet. If you doubt me you can easily falsify this yourself. Or you could discover something you've been ignorant of up until now. Try "rust cargo sucks" as a search motif. > random weirdos Which may or may not be true, but you believe it, and yet you use your time to comment to us. This is more of a criticism of yourself than of me; however, I do appreciate your attempt to be insulting and dismissive.
- sophacles 2y ago
  Im not attempting to insult you, i didn't know you held such a hypocritical position - sorry pointing out that it is weird for someone working a field that is so dependent on logic to hold such a self-contradictory position insults you. Maybe instead of weird i should use the words unusual and unexpected. My bad. You're right, I'm being dismissive of weasely unbacked claims of "wide regard". It's very clear now that you can't back your claim and I can safely ignore your entire argument as unfounded. Thanks for confirming!
anonfordays 2y ago
>Can you point me to both of: >* why it's considered low quality >* evidence of this "wide regard" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OdMQwDtumJ8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OdMQwDtumJ8
- anonfordays 2y ago
  Cargo/Rust is brought to you by a lot of the same minds that brought you the train wreck known as Node and npm.

anonfordays 2y ago

[flagged]

akira2501 2y ago

> why it's considered low quality Other software providing the same features produce better results for those users. It's dependency management is fundamentally broken and causes builds to be much slower than they could otherwise be. Lack of namespaces which is a lesson well learned before the first line of Cargo was ever written. I could go on. > evidence of this "wide regard" We are on the internet. If you doubt me you can easily falsify this yourself. Or you could discover something you've been ignorant of up until now. Try "rust cargo sucks" as a search motif. > random weirdos Which may or may not be true, but you believe it, and yet you use your time to comment to us. This is more of a criticism of yourself than of me; however, I do appreciate your attempt to be insulting and dismissive.

sophacles 2y ago
Im not attempting to insult you, i didn't know you held such a hypocritical position - sorry pointing out that it is weird for someone working a field that is so dependent on logic to hold such a self-contradictory position insults you. Maybe instead of weird i should use the words unusual and unexpected. My bad. You're right, I'm being dismissive of weasely unbacked claims of "wide regard". It's very clear now that you can't back your claim and I can safely ignore your entire argument as unfounded. Thanks for confirming!

anonfordays 2y ago

>Can you point me to both of: >* why it's considered low quality >* evidence of this "wide regard" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OdMQwDtumJ8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OdMQwDtumJ8

anonfordays 2y ago
Cargo/Rust is brought to you by a lot of the same minds that brought you the train wreck known as Node and npm.