3 ms·
It implies that for every thing people want there's a corresponding change to the way they think. There's a subset where that's true, but "Iso" is a stronger s
by __MatrixMan__ 2y ago
It implies that for every thing people want there's a corresponding change to the way they think.
There's a subset where that's true, but "Iso" is a stronger sort of morphism than what we have here. It must preserve structure everywhere to be an isomorphism.
- ocean_moist 2y agoYeah, perhaps I don’t want to use isomorphic as it sort of implies a universal quantifier. I think the relationship is weaker than isomorphism in retrospect. EDIT: On the other hand, all external stimuli changes the way we think, we are meaning making machines. Where there is something we try and make meaning of it. I think scale matters in terms of things impact on our thinking, but fundamentally the argument could be made that for all things people want there are changes in the way they think. Maybe clarifying “novel things” people want would be clearer.