3 ms·
> ZFS and Ceph is apples to oranges. Oxide is shipping an on-prem 'cloud appliance'. From the customer's/user's perspective of calling an API asking for storag
by throw0101b 2y ago
> ZFS and Ceph is apples to oranges.
Oxide is shipping an on-prem 'cloud appliance'. From the customer's/user's perspective of calling an API asking for storage, it does not matter what the backend is—apple or orange—as long as "fruit" (i.e., a logical bag of a certain size to hold bits) is the result that they get back.
- anonfordays 2y agoYes, it could be NTFS behind the scenes, but this is still an apples to oranges comparison because the storage service Oxide created is Crucible[0], not ZFS. Crucible is more of an apples to apples comparison with Ceph. [0] https://github.com/oxidecomputer/crucible https://github.com/oxidecomputer/crucible