4 ms·
yeah this is kinda cool i guess but 808 elo is still pretty bad for a model that can supposedly code like a human, i mean 11th percentile is like barely scrapin
by deisteve 2y ago
yeah this is kinda cool i guess but 808 elo is still pretty bad for a model that can supposedly code like a human, i mean 11th percentile is like barely scraping by, and what even is the point of simulating codeforces if youre just gonna make a model that can barely compete with a decent amateur, and btw what kind of contest allows 10 submissions, thats not how codeforces works, and what about the time limits and memory limits and all that jazz, did they even simulate those, and btw how did they even get the elo ratings, is it just some arbitrary number they pulled out of their butt, and what about the model that got 1807 elo, is that even a real model or just some cherry picked result, and btw what does it even mean to "perform better than 93% of competitors" when the competition is a bunch of humans who are all over the place in terms of skill, like what even is the baseline for comparison
edit: i got confused with the Codeforce. it is indeed zero shot and O1 is potentially something very new I hope Anthropic and others will follow suit
any type of reasoning capability i'll take it !
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- qt31415926 2y ago808 ELO was for GPT-4o. I would suggest re-reading more carefully
- deisteve 2y agoyou are right i read the charts wrong. O1 has significant lead over GPT-4o in the zero shot examples honestly im spooked