3 ms·
That seems less like an argument against public officials having enhanced scrutiny, and more an argument why they should have no scrutiny at all — because that’
by skygazer 2y ago
That seems less like an argument against public officials having enhanced scrutiny, and more an argument why they should have no scrutiny at all — because that’s the only defense against such a fanciful attack. That’s the logic that brought us the abomination of qualified immunity.