No, I don't believe in moralistic theory, your contemporary ideas of thought are dusty and cringe. I also believe something can be true wether or not it can be

No, I don't believe in moralistic theory, your contemporary ideas of thought are dusty and cringe. I also believe something can be true wether or not it can be proven, which disagrees with your hypothetical world of so few dimensions. Enjoy the research, I hold my breath for human understanding through such nuanced isolation of convention. Alas, not everything may be learned from by dissecting it further. My account of morality says there are such things as lawful and moral violence and murder (death of we were to bias the terms.) My morality says law must be entitled, competent, and uncorrupted. Such a law may go to great extremes to protect the innocent (unculpable before law). Such a law is consistently accountable for their corruption and negligence, the basis of their entitlement. I believe it revises nine thousand years of legal theory to say, "a righteous rule of law is one principled upon Truth, and serves to protect the innocent from violation by will or neglect."