4 ms·
I agree, it's cheap and easy enough to solve the issue, and if the Republican talking point bothers you so much, it shouldn't be too hard to prove it's not a pr
by carlmr 2y ago
I agree, it's cheap and easy enough to solve the issue, and if the Republican talking point bothers you so much, it shouldn't be too hard to prove it's not a problem by introducing mandatory free ID for all.
- iwontberude 2y agoEverytime I go vote, they take my ID and give me a ballot. Pretty sure voting identification is already working. This is a fake issue.
- sgerenser 2y agoIt depends on the state. Here in NC ID is not required to vote, and when they tried to pass a law requiring it, there was a huge backlash.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- iwontberude 2y agoSounds like it’s too unpopular for national let alone state policy.
- sgerenser 2y agoSo which is it, a fake issue (ID already required to vote), or ID isn’t actually required, but requiring ID is too unpopular so it shouldn’t be done?
- iwontberude 2y agoNot sure how you think they are mutually exclusive in any way. It's all three: A) a fake issue that our current ID is not sufficient, because B) a new source of ID isn't actually required as studies show, and C) requiring a new source of ID is too unpopular.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]