Heads up would have been explaining this at the time and not silently transferring ownership of the domain to a second for-profit entity with no lead up and no

Heads up would have been explaining this at the time and not silently transferring ownership of the domain to a second for-profit entity with no lead up and no announcement [0]. I'd have thought that after the trademark fiasco you'd have learned to be more open about your intentions for your for-profit arms, but it seems you might have taken the opposite lesson. [0] This announced Gitea Cloud but gave no explanation for why a second for-profit was created instead of just using the already-controversial Gitea Ltd: http://web.archive.org/web/20231127091431/https://blog.gitea.com/gitea-cloud/ http://web.archive.org/web/20231127091431/https://blog.gitea...