2 ms·
Hmmm, interesting that you give agency for 75 years of history to those in China, but not in India. Are you claiming there is some racial superiority of the Han
by kurthr 2y ago
Hmmm, interesting that you give agency for 75 years of history to those in China, but not in India. Are you claiming there is some racial superiority of the Han over Hindu? Couldn't you also argue that the rise of debt based mercantilist growth in China and subversion of Maoist Communism was a devious western European plan? Is that due to some inherent Aryan superiority that makes them responsible for every modern condition, or is it that devious plans put in place 50 years ago by Henry Kissinger and Winston Churchill have just come to fruition?
Just asking questions.
- bllguo 2y agoThe West controlled India to a degree that was thankfully not the case in China. This is basic history that the OP literally referenced > Just asking questions. Nobody is fooled. Have the courtesy to say what you mean instead of insinuating disgusting aspersions
- kurthr 2y agoOk, so Kissinger and Churchill. Thanks for the clarification. I'm sure you're aware of the Indo-Soviet cooperation treaty of '71. Those sneaky anglophones strike again. I'm surprised you've been fooled by their clever subterfuge in China. The current business conditions there are everyone's fault but their own. For reference it all started with tricking Deng into supporting the Khmer Rouge and embarassingly invading Vietnam in '78. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sino-Vietnamese_War https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sino-Vietnamese_War I assume The West is also responsible for the Wagner Group in Africa, but not for the fall of apartheid in South Africa. I just want to get the collective guilt right.