> It's a multierror, a feature of the standard library. Understood (I read the code), but that doesn't help, and really has nothing to do with the topic at han

> It's a multierror, a feature of the standard library. Understood (I read the code), but that doesn't help, and really has nothing to do with the topic at hand. Is the problem here that you don't have an understanding of what we're talking about? > You know that's not true from the history of the repository. Which is why the claim was identified as being strange and in need of clarification. How can "If I'm going to do something upstream based on the error, I use a type." be true? If there are many developers, you don't get to control the upstream.