Some of the problem stated in the post is a little forced, namely the issues with bisect and blame. That's only an issue if the review doesn't end with a squash

Some of the problem stated in the post is a little forced, namely the issues with bisect and blame. That's only an issue if the review doesn't end with a squash. Also as a user of gerrit via the Chromium project, I'm not aware of a way to structure the patch sets uploaded as individual changes without infinite foresight. It's always appended into the last. Whereas with github, at least you can rebase. I fully admit I could be missing a gerrit feature. That said... I would really love an interdiff feature for the GitHub rebase-to-fold-in-feedback-to-meaningful-commits workflow.