3 ms·
unless disclosed to employees and applicants this seems like de facto colluding. I always ask myself, as to the legality or ethics, would this survive review b
by theGnuMe 2y ago
unless disclosed to employees and applicants this seems like de facto colluding.
I always ask myself, as to the legality or ethics, would this survive review by a jury of my peers...
- fastball 2y agoYou think it is more ethical for wage data to be kept secret? Why? Rarely is requiring secrecy the more ethical option.
- cryptonym 2y agoWhat would be the least ethical would be keeping it secret to one party and having the other party sharing data... Oh wait!
- HeyLaughingBoy 2y agoGlassdoor exists.
- simion314 2y ago>Glassdoor exists. you are not allowed to tell anyone how much you make so you might be in trouble if your found out but the companies share this info without your consent. From my POV make it all transparent.
- HeyLaughingBoy 2y agoI have had a career spanning over 30 years at this point. I've worked in businesses with 6 employees and F500 corporations. No one has ever told me that I can't tell anyone else how much I make.
- cryptonym 2y agoSo... Pave shouldn't exists as "Glassdoor exists" and is already providing data?
- theGnuMe 2y agoI never said that.