Kudos, congrats and thanks for open sourcing your stuff. Your openness to feedback, even if not quite pleasurable, is impressive. I believe no contribution is

Kudos, congrats and thanks for open sourcing your stuff. Your openness to feedback, even if not quite pleasurable, is impressive. I believe no contribution is a good tradeoff that still guarantees user rights important to the free software movement. It is important that developers don't conflate free software and open to contribution. If managing contributions is not fun to someone, that shouldn't prevent them from releasing under an open source license, or force them into managing contributions. And if someone releases a version that you like, you can always upstream this stuff yourself if you don't require a CLA or anything like this. I will look into this thing, it seems useful. > Now the desktop Linux users can fix their own bugs (please don't hate me) Fair enough :-)