3 ms·
Having been recently exposed to PowerShell, I’m quite impressed by the balance they’ve struck in developing a new shell. I wouldn’t want to switch out Bash for
by sakjur 2y ago
Having been recently exposed to PowerShell, I’m quite impressed by the balance they’ve struck in developing a new shell. I wouldn’t want to switch out Bash for PowerShell, but that’s mostly based on the same reasoning as you have (I can’t be bothered to install new shells everywhere).
Though in a sense I think the most viable solution would be almost the opposite for UNIX: a reduced (and strict) shell syntax intended to be the target of crosscompilation rather than manual use. If it’d be possible to make that a subset of the standardized sh, there’d be automatic compatibility from the start and adoption wouldn’t need to happen on the consumer side.
Still, we have binaries already. Binaries are much more capable than what I’m suggesting, though they are platform dependent. A variant of WASM, maybe?
- Timwi 2y ago> Binaries are much more capable than what I’m suggesting, though they are platform dependent. Not if they're .NET/IL/CLR (which is an ECMA standard).
- sakjur 2y agoFair, though that’s still dependent on having a platform that follow that spec, in this case the common denominator for the platforms in question is POSIX rather than CLR.