3 ms·
This “holier than thou” attitude doesn’t make your point any stronger. It isn’t rage bait, and it isn’t a personal policy preference. “Have begun getting warra
by mvid 2y ago
This “holier than thou” attitude doesn’t make your point any stronger. It isn’t rage bait, and it isn’t a personal policy preference.
“Have begun getting warrants” means that they were doing this before, without them.
This is personal property that is being commandeered, bypassing constitutional rights. If the cameras have something the police consider evidence, then the police can go to a judge and get a warrant and then wait until the owner (who can be easily identified with auto registration records) responds.
If a crime happened outside of a store that has security cameras, then the police don’t get to break into the store and try to retrieve the data off of hard drives. They have to go through the proper channels and wait. This is no different.
- torstenvl 2y agoIt doesn't bypass any constitutional rights whatsoever. There is no constitutional right against police search and seizure of property they have a warrant for. Go read a book.
- eurleif 2y ago>“Have begun getting warrants” means that they were doing this before, without them. Would "have begun buying widgets" mean that they used to steal widgets? At worst, it's an ambiguous phrase; but context and common sense tell us that the ambiguity resolves in the opposite way from how you're resolving it.