> we should be expecting follow-up from a human being tasked with enforcing the law, right? That's very nice but until tor exit nodes are illegal, such police

> we should be expecting follow-up from a human being tasked with enforcing the law, right? That's very nice but until tor exit nodes are illegal, such police action is purely a harassment effort, right? One thing that struck me, years ago, is that the people running these actions (recipient of a death threat or police) are far more concerned with the fact that "someone enabled this", rather than the fact that someone was angry enough at them to issue a death threat. They had no visible concern about that wannabe murderer, apparently spending no effort trying to identify THEM. They just wanted retribution against the exit node operator. It was totally doing something for the sake of doing something, zero concern about solving any root problem. They had seemingly zero concern that their safety was a risk (I mean, from eventual action stronger than a death threat.) They also had zero awareness that anonymous email had allowed this ennemy to be revealed before any physical violence.