>Here's how I read it: We have this public API that we're not exactly sure how it works version to version, and, oh, we've just changed our parsing code Really

>Here's how I read it: We have this public API that we're not exactly sure how it works version to version, and, oh, we've just changed our parsing code Really? You read it wrong. It is "he have a public API that had a bug --that only surfaced when using it in a brain damaged way, anyway-- and we fixed it along with doing several DRY improvements to our code base. We also gave ample time of advance warning with our beta releases". "so if it breaks your stuff then tough shit because we're a bunch of amateurs." An ad-hominem? And its Rasmus that cones out as a little child, to your "mature" reading of the situation? Priceless. >I especially liked this quote: "Wow, a classic case of how not to treat unpaid volunteers who provide critical pieces of your money-making infrastructure." Perhaps it isn't about being paid, but about taking pride in the work you do. That includes fixing bugs and brain damaged edge cases of the public API. The complainer and your reading are so off the mark, I can't even begin to comprehend such attitudes exist...