4 ms·
That might work in a one-party consent state but the passenger who never interacts with the touch screen in a two-party consent state would have a stronger case
by lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 2y ago
That might work in a one-party consent state but the passenger who never interacts with the touch screen in a two-party consent state would have a stronger case. Though, even then, gathering the evidence that they're violating such laws would probably be a pretty big hurdle.
- linuxftw 2y agoTwo party consent is for wire tapping, eg, monitoring electronic communications. If they're monitoring meat-space communications, it's possible that wire tapping laws don't apply in the first place in most jurisdictions. Like an Alexa device.
- dghlsakjg 2y agoSome two party laws don't specify that it has to be over the wire. They refers to recording a conversation where there is an expectation of privacy. The cabin of a private car certainly falls under that.