3 ms·
Not a dupe. You are linking to tax evasion case. This is antitrust.
by nabla9 2y ago
Not a dupe.
You are linking to tax evasion case. This is antitrust.
- ethbr1 2y agoIt's easy to lose track of the number of times Google has been convicted of breaking the law.
- diggan 2y agoGood thing there is a Wikipedia page helping us keep track, with only 3 sections so far :) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antitrust_cases_against_Google_by_the_European_Union https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antitrust_cases_against_Google... Edit: My bad, the above page is just Antitrust cases made by the EU against Google. All the litigation sorrounding Google has it's own Wikipedia category (!!) as it's so much at this point: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Google_litigation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Google_litigation
- hinkley 2y agoWhen the list of cases against you gets alphabetized, you might have a problem. > The following 35 pages are in this category
- ChrisArchitect 2y agoThe articles and discussions are combined. There are already a number of threads. It's a dupe.