4 ms·

The pure vitriol and ad hominems ensure that facts against their narrative will not be presented.

• foobarqux 2y ago
  I'm sure you are intelligent enough to read his arguments and then go search out contradicting arguments and figure out for yourself which make more sense.
  • ripjaygn 2y ago
    His arguments like this? https://x.com/esghound/status/1511730625333665799 https://x.com/esghound/status/1511730625333665799 He's worthless as a source and not worth paying attention to.
    • foobarqux 2y ago
      That's funny because he predicted that they were in violation of the Clean Water Act a year ago, while people like you kept saying it was bullshit. It seems like there is definitely someone not worth listening to but it isn't him.
      • vatueil 2y ago
        ESGHound has lobbed many accusations, most of which did not pan out. Some of his accusations, such as the idea that SpaceX's development was a front for their real goal to drill for fossil fuel, could be considered conspiracy theories. Throw enough at the wall and something will stick. I am not convinced he is correct in this case either, just that he's gotten the ear of a likeminded journalist.