3 ms·
Well, it is obvious the if you don't need in-browser drawing you should just use static image files; but if you do, Raphael is way more versatile than canvas ap
by mbq 14y ago
Well, it is obvious the if you don't need in-browser drawing you should just use static image files; but if you do, Raphael is way more versatile than canvas api or tricks with CSS.
About bugs, I haven't seen any yet; what kind of them are you talking about?
- jberryman 14y agoMy use case was a simple vector-drawing program. Many bugs related to inconsistent behavior across browsers, and things generally not working as documented (difficult to tell what is a documentation bug and what an implementation bug sometimes). One that I actually had to fix (and submitted an as yet unacknowledged pull request for) was for arrow-ends: draw a path with an arrow head in blue, then draw one in red and watch every arrow-head on your page turn red. Here are the 258 open issues in github: https://github.com/DmitryBaranovskiy/raphael/issues I'm not trying to bad-mouth other peoples' work; just point out the current state of the project as I've experienced it, for the benefit of others.