2 ms·
I don't think people use "bullshitting" interchangably with "lying". I'm partial to this characterization: So bullshitting isn’t just nonsense. It’s construct
by jp57 2y ago
I don't think people use "bullshitting" interchangably with "lying". I'm partial to this characterization:
So bullshitting isn’t just nonsense. It’s constructed in order to appear meaningful, though on closer examination, it isn’t. And bullshit isn’t the same as lying. A liar knows the truth but makes statements deliberately intended to sell people on falsehoods. bullshitters, in contrast, aren’t concerned about what’s true or not, so much as they’re trying to appear as if they know what they’re talking about. ... [W]hen people speak from a position of disproportionate confidence about their knowledge relative to what little they actually know, bullshit is often the result. [1]
Doesn't this description like what LLMs do all the time?
[1] https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/psych-unseen/202007/the-psychology-bullshit https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/psych-unseen/202007/...
- function_seven 2y agoYeah I missed the nuance on the other side. If I know 80% of a subject, I can sometimes convince myself that I'm capable of "filling in the gaps" with on-the-fly constructions. But because "bullshitting" has some sorta agency behind it, while "hallucinating" is a thing that happens to you, I still lean toward the latter. But even better are the other replies that suggest "confabulation." "Hallucination" just sounds so nicely dystopian as we start to think about our coming AI overlords.