Why would it? The selling point of CentOS was that it was RHEL with a different logo, with all of the benefits and drawbacks. If MS doesn't create a RHEL clone

Why would it? The selling point of CentOS was that it was RHEL with a different logo, with all of the benefits and drawbacks. If MS doesn't create a RHEL clone while promising a century-long support period, I don't see how it could be an opportunity. Old CentOS users can switch to Alma/Rocky/Oracle for free, can shell out money for RHEL, or can switch to other distros - of course Azure is also an "other distro", but there are quite a few other with decades of history (better history than MS has)...