4 ms·

I dont get it, what's the unique insight in the article, isn't it just stats and bad data?

• FrustratedMonky 2y ago
  It's just being a bit reductive to just toss AI out as un-interesting because it is just based on statistics. And, think there is question of 'bad data' so study is bad/invalid, versus studying impact of 'bad data' on responses is the result.
  • asdasdsddd 2y ago
    I meant, the answer to the question of why does AI hallucinate is the same answer to the question "why does any statistical system ever produce an incorrect result" which I thought was well established.
    • FrustratedMonky 2y ago
      How can it be well established when the LLMs are still actively changing and improving. Don't think we can say, statistical systems can have incorrect results, hence we no longer need to study how statistical system produce incorrect results, because we already know they can have incorrect results.