4 ms·
> Whataboutism isn't a useful or helpful way to discuss an industry with unbelievable human suffering. I think you're misunderstanding my point. My point was n
by dirtdobber 2y ago
> Whataboutism isn't a useful or helpful way to discuss an industry with unbelievable human suffering.
I think you're misunderstanding my point. My point was not that there's not human suffering in the diamond industry, nor that it isn't bad. My point is that you, a person that cannot afford expensive natural diamonds (speaking statistically here, I don't know you personally), probably should not cast moral judgments on others that can and do purchase expensive natural diamonds. This is due to the fact that you, a person that can afford a cell phone, chooses to purchase a cell phone, despite that industry experiencing similar levels of human suffering. Therefore, I am forced to believe that in the counterfactual world where you can afford expensive diamonds, you would buy them.
- plokiju 2y agoIn the case of diamonds, you have the choice of buying the exact same product with human suffering involved, or without. If there were a lab-grown iPhone on the market, of course I would choose it
- dirtdobber 2y agohttps://shop.fairphone.com/fairphone-5 https://shop.fairphone.com/fairphone-5 Or, is some level of human suffering ok for you to have the luxury of using an iPhone?
- hungie 2y agoI make approximately 750k/year. I can afford diamonds. I choose not to buy them because they are a symbol of accepting human suffering for my luxury.
- dirtdobber 2y ago[flagged]