4 ms·
No, because on page 397 of the EULA that pops up on the in-dash LED screen after the 3rd OTA software update specifically stated you authorized this.
by linuxftw 2y ago
No, because on page 397 of the EULA that pops up on the in-dash LED screen after the 3rd OTA software update specifically stated you authorized this.
- jdsully 2y agoBut that's the point, you need consent of the person on the other side of the line too which didn't sign the EULA
- linuxftw 2y agoI took it to mean they're listening to the conversation inside of the car, not a telephone call being placed through the car's audio system.
- lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 2y agoThat might work in a one-party consent state but the passenger who never interacts with the touch screen in a two-party consent state would have a stronger case. Though, even then, gathering the evidence that they're violating such laws would probably be a pretty big hurdle.
- linuxftw 2y agoTwo party consent is for wire tapping, eg, monitoring electronic communications. If they're monitoring meat-space communications, it's possible that wire tapping laws don't apply in the first place in most jurisdictions. Like an Alexa device.
- dghlsakjg 2y agoSome two party laws don't specify that it has to be over the wire. They refers to recording a conversation where there is an expectation of privacy. The cabin of a private car certainly falls under that.