7 ms·
My Homelab Setup
- Brajeshwar 2y agoStumbled on his other article[1] on HN recently and I forgot to subscribe (RSS). I love the writings. Reading this article (Homelab Setup), I was thinking, that this is way overdone. Then, I quickly browsed around and love this guy’s life — Fatih has good taste. I'm inspired by the Homelab setup. 1. https://arslan.io/2024/05/05/braun-borse-2024/ https://arslan.io/2024/05/05/braun-borse-2024/
- farslan 2y agoThanks a lot for the kind words. I agree that certain parts (such as the Rack building process) were overdone, but where I live and how I live impacted some of these decisions.
- doesnt_know 2y agoI agree with the OP, you have impeccable taste. I fairly recently watched a documentary on Dieter Rams and have been somewhat obsessed since, looking forward to going through your back catalogue of posts. Whenever I get the urge to go full on homelab like this, I remind myself that my poor wife will have to deal with the whole thing if I pass away. I’ve sort of settled on just having a single small home Linux server that backs up otherwise accessible cloud stuff that my wife can manage. I can still appreciate your setup though…
- j45 2y agoLittle is overdone for creating beginners who need to go slow the first time, and then pretty quick after that.
- xupybd 2y agoMy home wifi setup is one AP in the ceiling.
- NegativeK 2y agoMine is the ISP provided router, but with nothing plugged into the WAN port and the DHCP/whatever services turned off. Next to an upstairs TV that we never turn off. Everyone's got what they're interested in; mine is definitely not radio voodoo.
- xupybd 2y agoYeah, looking at this guys site he's amazing at making stuff look good and has some interesting hobbies. Unfortunately his hobbies are out of my price range but he must have done well to get where he is.
- tehlike 2y agoWell written, and timely for me to get inspiration from. I have been going back and forth between doing off-the-shelf vs using opnsense/pfsense in a rackmount router. Haven't made mind on it yet. I will subscribe to 10gbps sonic fiber soon, that's what prompted me to look into this. Unifi seems to cap wifi 7 at 2.5Gbps, however.
- sorum 2y agoI can throw in my vote for Unifi. Stuck the UDM and the rest of the gear in a rackmounted enclosure in my daughter's wardrobe and haven't needed to think about it even once in 2+ years. It just manages itself nicely.
- tehlike 2y agoMy only issue is with aps. Their wifi7 is limited by 2.5g uplink.
- sorum 2y agoI was considering TP-Link at point of purchase, since there are some options there with more throughput. Like everything, it's a tradeoff calculation and this time I favored the convenience
- tehlike 2y agoWhy did you decide against tp-link? I give UI a +1 for overall quality/integration and being an American company, but TPLink seems also well praised recently. With Tapo Cameras etc they seem to be going in the steps of UI too.
- sorum 2y agoHonestly, it was a very close call. I had two shopping lists written down, one for Unifi, one for TP-link. It was a combination of a couple of factors. It was actually a really tough decision, because they both seemed very good value for money. I wasn't factoring in cameras, just controller + switch + APs. It was a combination of a couple of factors (this was in 2022): - UI and integration - Number of reviews and write-ups - What I could find in stock If I were doing it again today, I couldn't guarantee that my decision would be the same. It'd be a tough one...yet again.
- wannacboatmovie 2y agoNot to be critical, but the homelabs I find truly impressive are the objectively unpretty ones. Those that resemble the OpenBSD build system - a menagerie of servers haphazardly racked in a basement, Ethernet cables strewn about, and a questionable UPS setup that might get a second glance from the fire marshal. It's a lab, not a museum piece. Even Apple's labs look more like any other thrown-together engineering lab than something for public consumption.
- tehlike 2y agoPrevious discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41510422 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41510422
- wannacboatmovie 2y agoI'm curious, how do duplicates make it to the front page? My experience in submitting links that are less than a year old, the submission gets rejected and you are pointed to the previous submission.
- deisteve 2y agoLet me get this straight, you spent a bunch of time and money on a 12U rack, a bunch of Unifi switches, and a bunch of cameras, and you're just now realizing that you need to set up VLANs and firewall rules? That's not a "homelab project", that's just a bunch of stuff you bought and now you're trying to figure out how to make it work. And what's with the obsession with aesthetics? You spent a bunch of money on fancy cable management and patch panels, but you're still using a bunch of ugly, exposed cables. It's like you're trying to make a statement about how much money you have, rather than actually building a functional network. And don't even get me started on the DNS settings. You're using a custom domain name for your Synology NAS, but you're still using DHCP to assign IP addresses. What's the point of having a custom domain name if you're just going to use a dynamic IP address? I'm not trying to be mean-spirited, but this post just reeks of "I have a lot of money and I want to show it off". If you're actually interested in building a functional home lab, I'd be happy to offer some advice. But if you're just looking for a way to justify buying a bunch of expensive networking gear, then maybe you should just stick to playing with your toys.
- cyberax 2y ago> And what's with the obsession with aesthetics? Aesthetics are important! Especially for home use, where you might be looking at your systems all the time.
- deisteve 2y agohonestly, I've always thought the focus on aesthetics was a bit... superficial. I mean, who cares what the thing looks like as long as it gets the job done? But the more I think about it, the more I realize that's a pretty utilitarian view. If I'm going to be staring at this thing for hours a day, shouldn't I want it to be visually appealing? And let's not forget, a well-designed system can actually make troubleshooting and maintenance easier. I've seen some beautifully cable-managed rigs that make it a joy to work on. Maybe I've been wrong to dismiss aesthetics all these years... you've got a point, aesthetics maybe matter.
- lloeki 2y ago
- system2 2y agoLooking badass but hear me out. You don't need any of these unless you just want to spend $2-3k+. A simple Sonicwall router + 2-3 wired devices are more than enough setup. For wifi, a cheap TP-Link mesh works well which only costs $30 to upgrade per room. For commercial clients, we use the Unifi series and are very happy with it. I won't use Unifi for home because its strength is too high and I am very paranoid when it comes to signals blasting and penetrating more than a drywall. Wifi shouldn't be strong enough to be picked up outside of my house and I accomplish it with weak tplink per room mesh units. I don't remember using more than 350 mbit data transfer over my ethernet since my internet speed is capped at 350 mbit. My NAS is connected to my SonicWall directly and can reach maximum read/write speeds (for cloud backups). I'd invest that money in the stock market and make money instead. But I get it. A hobby is a hobby.
- tehlike 2y agoYou are future proofing, and it's not a bad thing. I started with cable, then moved to fiber, and now planning to move to 10Gbps fiber with sonic, and for sure I use any bandwidth I can. At 1Gbps, I do saturate a lot of providers for things I do, but for the ones I don't, it's helpful.
- bustling-noose 2y agoIsn't this more of a home network rather than home lab ? Lab would be where you can run software and hardware to actually experiment with things. Within a closed setup like Unifi you are hardly experimenting with anything if at all. Cool setup no doubt because unifi does make some good bang for your buck hardware that is low maintenance if you want to mostly just set it and forget it. And this looks like one of those set it and forget it control from a panel things. But this is less lab and more network imo.
- NegativeK 2y ago> Lab would be where you can run software and hardware to actually experiment with things. I used to push back against this, and I ended up getting really frustrated. But then I realized that nobody else really cares, language changes, and I should just pay attention to other sources if I didn't like it. At this point, to me, "homelab" means Plex, maybe some good organization of your stuff, and just enjoying setting something up that probably isn't really experimental. AKA production, but for the home. I might be imagining it, but it seems like most people who are experimenting don't call it a homelab first, if they do at all. It's "the HA cluster I'm playing with" or "my AD setup for pentesting" or whatever.
- pchangr 2y agoVery off-topic but I’m glad you shared this. I get fixated a lot on language use and find it hard to accept that it evolves. Your approach to dealing with it sounds mature and it’s inspiring.
- j45 2y agoIt could just be the start of a network to play with and build on. In a home, having this kind of a setup is akin to installing appliances that can be set, forgot, and relied on more and more. Everything can have a fast connection, and if enough people work from home, etc, it can be really useful. There's always ways to make do, and have failover, or backup internet, but in reality, it can be worth it to look at plug and play for home like this to not rely on anything. Ubiquiti has taken it's lumps recently, but their stuff is still generally OK for home. Other providers like TP-Link with their OMADA setup are quite decent too, it's always possible to go full pfSense, or better yet, as an appliance, just buy a Netgate switch that can do a lot relatively for great bang for the buck. I have recently used a Ubiquity Dream Machine Pro SE, and it's super decent for any small office or home setup. It just kind of runs, and you can reasonably run and segment a fair bit. It's too bad the new hardware took a step back in what the software allowed but it looks like they're adding the features each release little by little. A lot of hardware for homelabs can increasingly get into issues with licensing, updates, etc. Once we are beyond 2.5 Gbit fibre into most homes, the jump to 10 Gig equipment and beyond and how to slice and dice it has fewer options. I would today, not purchase any 1Gbit or 2.5Gbit fibre network hardware. Speeds are increasing, too fast. My homelab might have an older switch one day that an handle multiple 10gig fibre runs, both inside and maybe coming inside. Having a part of a homelab that is like an appliance (largely set and forget), it can let you have more time to experiment with the experimental. Production grade in a homelab can be possible too, where others might rely on it. Don't want that getting in the way of homelabbing.
- nevi-me 2y ago> I knew my concrete home would be a big challenge if I didn't deploy multiple APs to every floor or room. Concrete walls cut out Wi-Fi signals more than dry walls. We're building a house, moving from an apartment. I ensured that we get a fiber line to each room, and 2 to open spaces where I might want to extend wifi networks. Then CAT 6 cables to where cameras will be. I have a Nest wifi with 2 router extensions and a wireless one, so I've prioritised where I'll place those (and their eventual replacements). My setup will be simpler, because I'm not really building a home lab (I agree with other comments that this isn't really a homelab). I just want to move noisy devices like a NAS and switches to the garage. My home office has space for a long rack if I desire one, but I think I'm going to make it a hybrid glass-door display cabinet that also houses the desktop so I don't hear fan noises. This is a good write-up still because it's giving me ideas of what I might need for networking.
- amatecha 2y agoFibre to each room?! Nice, is that a common thing to do these days? I've been starting to plan wiring cat6 (or cat7 or whatever) around my place, but I didn't even know fibre is something people use throughout the home (I always thought of it as "you get fibre to the home and then ethernet within"). Interesting... I imagine there is quite the price difference though, among other differences. More to research I guess!
- zekica 2y agoFibre cables are not expensive, they are even cheaper than Cat6. Transceivers are a bit expensive, but got a lot cheaper than they used to be, still they are really cheap compared to other house build/remodel costs. The only issue is that you can't do power over fibre so it's inconvenient for putting wifi APs, cameras, and other powered devices.
- j45 2y agoI think it's a good idea, it's generally more price reasonable than 20 years ago. Hell, there was probably a time where ethernet was too expensive to put into a house.
- 2y ago
- helf 2y ago[dead]
- hamandcheese 2y agoUbiquity sure does make some pretty gear, but I will never trust them with my firewall. Makes me sad that so many homelabbers do. Can't quite put my finger on why that saddens me.
- Arn_Thor 2y agoWhy wouldn’t you trust them?
- hamandcheese 2y ago- proprietary - closed source - cloud connected
- asynchronous 2y agoI can think of several enterprise brands that are also all three of those.
- hamandcheese 2y agoI'm sure I don't trust them either.
- Arn_Thor 2y agothanks for the reply
- paulgerhardt 2y agoTen years ago Ubiquiti offered commercial grade hardware at consumer prices. Now I understand it’s the inverse. At least according to the disgruntled former employees that left sometime between the lifelogging wearable camera acquisition and the forced cloud/updates and the “massive” data breach. What would be the 2024 version of how great UI was in 2014? Or what are your fellow hacker setups? Ideally something that does local first management, connection bonding, 10gbs, tailscale level of simplicity? I have the same setup as the author and uncomfortable with the Apple-ification of the product to something that looks pretty without meaningful root privileges.
- asynchronous 2y agoI’d say Ubiquiti is still the best pro-sumer for home networking. They’re expensive, but they really do have a quality and ease of integration/setup/use that just isn’t matched, even when you get to enterprise level (go setup a Cisco without your CCNA and then come tell me about how great it is).
- timc3 2y agoI have to agree with this to a point. I went with Mikrotik a while ago, which delivers great bang for the buck but oh my god the UX is terrible. Not helped that I don't want to spend more time learning it fully (it would be more cost effective to trash it and buy something else). TP-Link and omeda is probably an alternative, but after spending time trying to figure out what they offer and what their alternatives are for my needs I just give up with their confusing model numbers and half hearted explainations. The problem I really have with Ubiquiti is when I look at their offerings and what I need I am immediately put into their Enterprise offerings and I am running 48 ports.
- fmajid 2y agoThe main reason why consumer wireless APs fail is inadequate power supplies. Ubiquiti gear is solid in this respect.
- colordrops 2y agoBuild your setup around an OPNSense router. Once you've got that setup, then add from there, whether it be a PoE managed switch from eBay, a NAS, camera setup, rack server, or whatever. But don't buy Ubiquiti or any other of these locked in ecosystems whatever you do.
- mikae1 2y agoThe first rule about your home network is…
- farslan 2y agoOP here: Thanks for all the comments. The Rack is inside a small attic, where I also have my 3D printers and various other tools: https://imgur.com/a/pxSXvQH https://imgur.com/a/pxSXvQH I just called it homelab, because I've seen people use the names interchangeable. Happy to answer any questions not explained in the blog post.
- tobiasbischoff 2y agoNice work, thanks for showing.
- jimwalsh 2y agoLove my Ubiquity setup. Nice post OP showing people at of the possible. Have fun learning the setup!
- farslan 2y agoThank you for the kind words.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- mightyhacker658 2y ago[dead]