4 ms·
I'm not sure it makes sense to talk in such absolutes (requiring a proof of impossibility) in such a fluid category - after all, you could include the imaginary
by eviks 2y ago
I'm not sure it makes sense to talk in such absolutes (requiring a proof of impossibility) in such a fluid category - after all, you could include the imaginary perfect replica of the human brain in the NN category, and obviously human brains can do this task.
But then again, this categorization provides no information to make any assessment of whether that is in any way achievable.
- Sharlin 2y agoSure. Not in the sense of "here’s a proof that a perceptron cannot learn XOR", but at least something that would hint that there are qualitative gaps in the expressive power of DLNNs, or even LLMs specifically.