4 ms·
One of the intended uses of this site is to exchange best practices and learn from the mistakes of other startups. I think that this blog post falls in the seco
by languagehacker 14y ago
One of the intended uses of this site is to exchange best practices and learn from the mistakes of other startups. I think that this blog post falls in the second category. And I don't think that there's anything wrong with me pointing it out.
I'm glad it worked out for the folks at Cue, but I think they could have avoided a lot of headaches with some better planning. I'm not suggesting some radical technique I just made up; I'm pointing out that there exist practices that would have prevented a needless scramble.
The circumstances of this story should not serve as an example to other startups, but rather a cautionary tale of what can happen to a shop without the proper release cycle and adequate project management in place. My tone may have been a little rough, sure. I probably wouldn't have even commented if the post had addressed what went wrong and what they learned from it.
I guess heroic last-minute efforts amount to a more entertaining story than adequate planning, but I think we can all agree on which method is a more reliable way to run a successful software shop.