4 ms·
I wouldn't even frame that as "not trust": of course it's rarely more than that one guy! And technically, that's perfectly sufficient for what they claim, even
by usrusr 2y ago
I wouldn't even frame that as "not trust": of course it's rarely more than that one guy! And technically, that's perfectly sufficient for what they claim, even though practically it's several orders of magnitude less than what a favorable reader might read into it. Take it with a spoonful or two of salt. This is not really different from "not trust", only a little less bitter.
- tecleandor 2y agoWell, yes, it's technically correct, the best kind of correct ;) But it's tru it 's a bit mischaracterizing, making it look like they're kind of "official" in some departments there.