I assumed they were talking about the numbers of this tech in that post. I assumed everyone was talking about the numbers of this tech. You quoted the next bit

I assumed they were talking about the numbers of this tech in that post. I assumed everyone was talking about the numbers of this tech. You quoted the next bit about land use in the US: > > Do we need efficiency gains? Like more is better, but in the US, land is cheap in many areas. > Yes. Anything that lets us offline coal plants faster will save lives. Assuming all else is equal, it's literally free energy. Why wouldn't you want that? What a bizarre question. I'm sorry if I'm being weird. It really looks like you're arguing efficiency is something standing in the way of saving lives.