3 ms·
Linux actually did have some pretty significant redesigns with some notable breaking changes. It wasn't until the 2.4 line ended in the late oughts that Linux a
by kbolino 2y ago
Linux actually did have some pretty significant redesigns with some notable breaking changes. It wasn't until the 2.4 line ended in the late oughts that Linux as we know it today came fully into existence.
- yencabulator 2y agoLinux 2.6 internals were very different from 2.4 internals which were hugely different from 2.2. Programming for the three was almost like targeting 3 different kernels.
- dredmorbius 2y agoWhat were some of those changes / developments?
- kbolino 2y agoSome major, visible components to be added in 2.6 over 2.4 were ALSA, LVM2, and udev, all of which remain in modern kernels. The 2.4 kernel series also had a lot of differences over 2.2 but many of them were "half-baked" compared to where they ended up in 2.6 (e.g., input subsystem, iptables). Also, module loading was changed significantly; there's some documentation at https://tldp.org/HOWTO/Module-HOWTO/linuxversions.html https://tldp.org/HOWTO/Module-HOWTO/linuxversions.html The evolution starting from 2.6 has been much more gradual, especially at the interface between the kernel and other code. The version numbers are not nearly as significant as they used to be. There were more fundamental changes between 2.4 and 2.6 than between 3.0 and 4.0. Instead of discrete leaps, the kernel now changes through continuous, small increments, and such a pace was made possible by the current (2.6+) kernel architecture.
- dredmorbius 2y agoThanks!