> So the study[0] involved people making simulated drone strike decisions. These people were not qualified to make these decisions for real and also knew the as

> So the study[0] involved people making simulated drone strike decisions. These people were not qualified to make these decisions for real and also knew the associated outcomes were also not real. This sounds like a flawed study to me. Unless I missed something, they also don't check for differences between saying the random advice is from an AI vs saying it's from some other more traditional expert source.