4 ms·
Do you have a recommendation for Wiki software you like to use? My team is in need of an internal knowledge base, and I like the structure of wikis. Most of the
by caseyohara 2y ago
Do you have a recommendation for Wiki software you like to use? My team is in need of an internal knowledge base, and I like the structure of wikis. Most of the SaaS products I've tried or looked at are a bit too shiny/fancy and don't seem to match my mental model of how a wiki-style knowledge base should work.
- shnock 2y agoConfluence, but we're already in deep w Atlassian
- hinkley 2y agoI don't think it really matters which you use. I've unfortunately been stuck in Atlassian for ages. But if you were shopping for one, from the standpoint of keeping the docs working being able see missing pages and see incoming links to a page are both pretty helpful. I kinda miss the latter.
- left-struck 2y agoIf you can self host, wiki.js is easy to set up in a docker container. Mediawiki (What Wikipedia runs on) is pretty easy too. If you have a small team, Obsidian and a syncing solution like git or obsidian sync might work. I was able to work with my company’s it team to set up a wiki which is only accessible from within the network, including by vpn, and is hosted on a vps.
- zelphirkalt 2y agoMy recommendation is, if you want a wiki for developers, use something that is based on a markup language, sources pages from a git repo, and does not do too much magic behind the scenes. This will result in a more maintained and liked wiki than any bloated SaaS wiki.
- ssernikk 2y agoI like using Starlight for this purpose: https://starlight.astro.build/ https://starlight.astro.build/
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- infogulch 2y agoOxide Computer published their Request for Discussion (RFD) site software [1] that they use for internal published documentation and discussion. Many are published to the public, but some are private. [2] They talk about how they use it and where it came from in their most recent podcast: RFDs: The Backbone of Oxide [3]. I suspect this would be a good 'substitute' for documents that are often hosted on internal wikis. [1]: https://github.com/oxidecomputer/rfd-site https://github.com/oxidecomputer/rfd-site [2] https://rfd.shared.oxide.computer/rfd/0001 https://rfd.shared.oxide.computer/rfd/0001 [3]: https://oxide.computer/podcasts/oxide-and-friends/2065190 https://oxide.computer/podcasts/oxide-and-friends/2065190