> No, the direct compensation of the CEO is still only a hundred bucks or so. That's what I said: "as compared to the direct compensation of the CEO, which wou

> No, the direct compensation of the CEO is still only a hundred bucks or so. That's what I said: "as compared to the direct compensation of the CEO, which wouldn't go very far." You appear to be confused. > No, it provides a permanent bump to the price A permanent bump LOL. There's no such thing in the stock market. If the company maximizes short-term results while screwing itself in the future, that so-called "permanent" bump isn't going to last.